100%

Lately I have been reading about education and Aboriginals in one of my textbooks.

It caused me to reflect on my education experiences. If it weren’t for my family who have been there for me no matter what, and to help push me through, I don’t think I would have done all the great things I have done in my life.

However, this is not what this post is about. Yes, I did excel in school. I graduated top three in elementary school. In high school (even after a really bad car accident where I sustained an Acquired Brain Injury), I even graduated on the honor roll, received a scholarship upon graduation, and won four business awards. But this is not what this is about. It is about the fact that even though, I did do well in school, there was a lack of support for me and other similar students. What I mean by other similar students is other Aboriginal students who excelled.

I remembered being teased sometimes for being too smart or getting good grades. When I look back, it all means nothing today. I remember those around me who excelled as well, they also were teased (whether they were Aboriginal or not).

It amazes me how little support there is for Young Aboriginal people who excel in school. My teachers throughout elementary school consistently would approach their students as they would approach “bad kids.” Because as one supply teacher put it, upon her first day of supplying for us for the rest of the school year, “Don’t think that I don’t know what your reputation is.” I was the only student that asked, “What is our reputation, because even we don’t know what it is.” I wasn’t a “bad kid,” but I did stand up for myself and others. The teacher that day didn’t answer but told me to go to the office. I went. It wouldn’t be the first time I was sent to the office for asking why the teacher said something or what the teacher actually meant when she said we were “just a bunch of dumb cows.”

This may come as surprising to people who read this, but in the school I went to it doesn’t surprise me looking back. We were at a school with the majority of the population being Aboriginal (sad even for me to say that). So, I really do wonder what the school is like today? Is it still the same, population wise? Reputation wise? Teacher wise? I plan to go back one day and influence the young people, Aboriginal or not, but to tell them that if you work hard (yes, school does kind of suck sometimes) and if you don’t let all the teasing (yes, it will be hard) get to you, it does get better. And really, the teasing and the name calling (even though hard to endure at such a young age and sometimes all alone), it doesn’t matter when you’re older. When you work hard, study, and apply yourself 100% to everything you do, that is what matters.

1950s

Sometimes I wish I lived in an era like that of the 1950s, but then I remember as a First Nations person I wouldn’t have been allowed to vote

Update: And probably as a kid, would have been in placed in a Residential school.

Newsworthy

The problem with online news today is the question of “newsworthiness.”

I always question my self when I am about to write about something or give my opinion on a certain topic. I question myself with: Is this actually real and if it is where did the original post come from or who is the original poster?

Obviously I reacted and wrote to soon on the most recent wikileaks hoax; fortunately, I reacted just as fast to remove my response to the hoax. Who wants to be apart of that? Even on Facebook and other social networking sites that post fake amber alerts (yes, these have happened), I would research key words in the fake posts/hoaxes.

Unfortunately, because this source said it was the original poster and failed to include an editor’s note, I trusted them. This creates a problem for that news source. It’s readers, if they want to be informed readers, will question whether the source is reliable or question the accuracy of the story on a repeated basis.

Not only does this experience make me want to be even MORE aware, it makes me really angry. I have never posted a link or a response to an Aboriginal news source article until that article. This makes me upset because I have very little trust in Aboriginal news sources and now I have almost little to no trust. Am I to blame? Yes. I should have taken the steps to insure the story was accurate.

I know there are some great journalists or reporters out there but the creation of a hoax originating from an Aboriginal news source (well known or not), in my opinion, makes other Aboriginal news sources look bad (and that makes me equally unimpressed as upset with the source).

I hope that this news source learns from this experience to realize that if they are going to post a “humorous/untruthful” story, they should make a note of it.

Leaks a Hoax

Hoax?

Apparently it is being reported that the wikileaks on Minister Duncan is now a “hoax.”

Really.

And that the article was meant to be “humourous” and that those things were just “imagined.”

Really.

Whether the things have been said or not, it was imagined what would or could have been said by a government official. What does that say about an Aboriginal’s view of Canada’s officials? Not very much.

For a government official to take something not so serious, serious, shows where his priorities are. (His own public image.) Why not join in on the joke? Let people believe whatever they want to believe. It’s not like everyone (Aboriginal or not) thinks highly of the Canadian government anyways.

Am I happy people are paying attention to what exactly is being said by First Nations? Sure. Duncan’s team worked hard and fast to remove these posts.

I wish rest of the issues affecting First Nations were addressed this quickly. Obviously when I say this, I know that “processes” and “policies” have to be followed, and that some situations are more important than others.

It is too bad the response to the supposed humorous and satirical article was not answered in just a humorous, satirical manner. It would have been refreshing.

Click HERE to read the article in which it was shared that the leaks is a hoax.

Update 01/19/11: It’s strange how media can change any story to either emphasize one point or de-emphasize another point, or even completely alter the story. My post in response to the hoax and APTN’s own response/reporting on it just proves this. Yes, I did wrong by posting a response to the originating article (even after the original news source said it was “first to report” and failed to include an “Editor’s Note” stating it was meant for PURE entertainment; and even when the Reporter’s name “looked Native”–in reality it wasn’t really anyone at all). Aside from all that, I noticed that APTN mentions that I provide “a point by point analysis.” Correction APTN: I provided an analysis only on three of the ten points. These points were not even an “analysis” at all. One of the points I could relate back to another point I was trying to make in a previous post on my blog (re: The use of the term Fiduciary Duty). Another was point was highlighted to only probe further questioning/gain an understanding of what was being said in the supposed “wikileaks,” and the other just highlighted the “paradox” between Canada’s history and present-day Aboriginals. Even though I “reported” wrongly on this originating article containing the hoax (and I put reported in quotation marks to highlight the fact that I am not an official reporter), I must say, “Thank you APTN for boosting my readers.”

Token Indian

“I am so happy to have you on the team. As soon as I found out you were native, I just had to hire you!.”

These words, even though spoken more almost 10 years ago, have stuck with me since I heard them.

When I think back, I believe for someone to say, “As soon as I found out you were native, I just had to hire!” is highly inappropriate. It is inappropriate because it is unprofessional. Since that day I consistently ask myself whenever hired for a new job (or not hired for a job): were they looking at my skills or my ethnic background? One might say that employers only look at your skills and your abilities. No. It is not always like that. This is clear when some jobs hire people strictly for their appearance (the “hot” bartender) and even some for their background (how to improve your public image 101).

I know that I am a hard-worker. I know that I have many skills, and many of these skills have to do with not being “Indian” at all. Someone once said that I was overreacting and still am overreacting when I think back to what was said to me that day, and that I should use being “Indian” to my advantage. How does one use their ethnic background to their advantage? Is that even possible? Or should I be offended by that as well?

Just recently another First Nations student shared a story with me on how her professor pointed out to the rest of her class that the only three Native students didn’t get in “just because they were Native.” Who says that? Where is the professional tact in announcing that to the entire class?

In both of these instances, one might say, “Well, Natives certainly have it best.” No, we don’t have it best. Already as a minority or person of a different ethnic background, we already know that we are different. We don’t need a constant reminder of this, whether it be at work, in school, or just out on the playground (Who wants to play cowboys and Indians?).

If there is one thing that can be said about both of these situations it is that both persons in their position of power had a lack of respect, especially to the persons they were speaking to. To announce to someone that as soon as you found out someone was Native and they just HAD to hire you or that the only three native students didn’t get in “just because they were Native” is unprofessional.

Being “Indian” isn’t all what it is cracked up to be. We don’t get everything for free, we don’t have it better off than the rest of the Country, and we most certainly don’t have the same given respect as the rest in some of the places you expect everyone to be treated equally (no matter their ethnic background).

Hired Fired

For the past year, I have spent hours pouring over many different job advertisements on many different job posting sites. One site I like in particular is Indeed.ca because of its ability to search for key words on all sites on the internet.

I am a full-time university student who completed a college diploma program with placement experience. I really enjoyed my placement. I really enjoyed my program. I just had a feeling I wasn’t going to have a job upon graduation (yes, some may say that the negative thinking might have contributed, maybe). Thus, I applied to university.

I have a lot of personal dreams. Three of these dreams include:

1) Graduating from university (whether it be now, or finding employment, working a few years then going back).

2) Owning my own business (I would love to work with Aboriginals and Businesses within Canada and perhaps become a negotiator one day).

3) On side of owning my own business, I would love to become a motivational speaker.

Yes, these dreams can be halted with a full-time job, but for the right job. I feel that I am not the only individual in Canada who wants to work at the “right” job. Read “Why Canada’s jobs market isn’t as strong as it appears” for a bit of an insight to why I say this. Nevertheless, searching for that “right” job can be difficult. What makes it more difficult is, whatever everyone says and agrees on, the economy.

I beg to differ. I don’t think the problem with finding jobs is with the economy. I believe it is with the recruitment/hiring processing.

There must be two points that must be noted before I continue with this blog they are:

1) I am not lazy. I am actually a very hard worker. I work best with little supervision (and of course, the right worker can and will work best with little supervision).

2) When I write about what I am about to write about, it must be noted that I looked for employment from all corners of the job-posting world: part-time dishwasher; full-time career (in the field I went to school for); and on-call work (mainly hospitality, aka “as-needed-basis”).

Let’s get started:
The first problem begins in the job description. Employers need to be upfront about what they are looking for and what they are willing to offer to the right person with the right skills and right amount of experience (it is true for careers that amount of pay follows experience). The more open and upfront an employer can be straight in the beginning, more than likely he/she will find a “perfect” match for the job to be filled. Basically, so nobody wastes anybody’s time.

The second problem, particularly for part-time job advertisements, is the term “flexibility.” Basically that is a nice way for an employer to say, “no students, no family, no other jobs.” Some employers have even gone to the length of saying “No Students.” Ouch.

The third problem is the listing of more jobs only to cover a certain amount of time, in other words contract work. This is a convenient way for an employer to hire someone they need for a specific job without hiring them full-time and without paying the individual an array of benefits. Yes, maternity leave is the one exception where this works out well for everyone involved. The new employee receives experience and probably a good reference. The returning employee receives their job once the contract is up. The employer, well, hopefully they are loyal enough to hire the original employee once their maternity leave is over (yes, people who have gone on maternity leave have not been hired back… this exists and it’s real, even in Canada). I feel that this type of contract work to be the least stressful. However, with the rise of contract work (as reported in Globe and Mail, Canada’s shifting job market), I feel that the idea of potentially not having a job when the contract is over may be rattling for any employee, which could possibly lead to more stress for the individual. This presents the question of: How come more contract jobs are appearing? Are there more people having babies? Or are more and more companies looking to hire people only for specific jobs for a specific amount of time at a specific pay with very little benefits? You pick.

The fourth problem is the competition. Not the competition between employers (unless you are a highly sought after individual, creme de la creme), but rather competition between potential employees. This usually happens in entry level jobs (you have to start somewhere right?) and it is usually experienced in the hospitality industry as well. If I can describe in the most outrageous way in order to describe what happens here is this: imagine John Doe looking for a hooker. Hooker A says she will do this for this amount nothing less. Hooker B says she will do this, this, and even THIS for the same amount as Hooker A or sometimes even less. Who do you think John Doe is going to pick? Not Hooker A. He definitely wants more “bang” for his buck. (There is an actual book that I remember reading about that talks about how this works in Canada and how the John Does are putting the girls at risk by asking more for less and consistently exercising this control over the girls with their money. One might say, the girls put themselves at risk, unfortunately, it never begins that way. I have since been searching for this book, because I would like to read what else is inside it.)

The fifth and final problem is the good old game of “come in for one shift and we will see how you do.” I have experienced this many times. Managers telling me, “we will call you as an on-needed basis.” When I follow up a week later to see if I ever will actually be called, no reply is ever heard from them again. This also goes hand and hand in offering free-services as a potential employee to demonstrate your skills with the hopes of being called first when they actually do the hiring. This is a bad idea all around. I highly recommend against it.

Maybe the problem is with me. If it is, I would really like someone to tell me what that problem is.

And maybe, the above is all because of the economy and its problems. However, as I said before, I don’t think it is. I think it has to do with the John Doe’s of the business world trying to get more “bang” for their buck. The one’s looking for the job are just left out there to roam the streets. Fighting to be part of creme de la creme, highly sought after.

Note: I know there are good, no wait, great employers out there (I am not bashing every one who pays someone to do work for them/under their name, don’t get me wrong). In fact, the best job I ever had was my first: a summer job working for the best boss I ever had. I washed dishes for two summers, along with doing a lot of inventory, but I certainly miss working for that individual today. I worked with little to no supervision, my creative input was valued, and I knew what had to get done and how it had to get done (cleaning dishes and inventory wasn’t the only thing I had to do; there was many opportunities for me to take initiative which I did most frequently). When an employer values his/her employee more than to do the job they hired them for, the employee will feel valued and be willing to do more than what is asked of them. I wish more employers were as open and honest as this person was/is.

Culture & Heritage

A very cool site about to be launched in London ON. Thank you, London ON.

Click here to see LFpress online article.

Text taken right from article regarding event includes:
If you go

What: Heritage Portal Launch

When: Thursday, 5 to 8 p.m.

Where: County of Middlesex Administration Building,

399 Ridout St. N.

Who: All welcome

How much: Free

What’s included: Tours of historic county jail, appetizers and cash bar.

To find the portal

Log on to londonheritage.ca after Thursday’s launch

London Jobs

This LFpress.com article just supports the fact that the quality of jobs for university educated individuals is on the decline.

Especially the part where it reads: Douglas Porter, deputy chief economist with BMO Capital Markets, noted Ontario’s job gains includes a “massive” surge of 42,000 jobs in the manufacturing sector, along with a similar jump in the transportation sector.

I say “on the decline” because it is with general knowledge that manufacturing and transportation sector jobs usually involve nothing more than a high school education (and 42,000 of them! Can you say “assembly-line”?)

On the side note: I remember reading somewhere that the old mayor, Best, wanted to create jobs (oh yes, her January 2010 address to council) and this year somehow both candidates wanted to attract post-secondary votes. The fact that there was barely any student attendance at their event at the beginning of the school year held at UWO, just high-lighted the fact that there was lack of support from students (Heck, I don’t even know if I can vote for London council? Can I, and how do I find out? Guess I should have went to that event).

When jobs in London only focus on manufacturing and transportation sectors, the people of London, leaders or not, can definitely expect that people who have just finished post-secondary education can and will leave London ON. Sure “creation of jobs” looks and reads great on any newspaper, and gives a glimpse of hope for citizens of the city. However, when one actually reads the entire article, they may be let down and any glimpse of hope may be extinguished.

Click HERE to read the full article.

Archaic

The globe and mail posted an article relating to Canada’s Freedom of Information compared to other democratic countries. Click HERE to read the article.

In the article, it says that the reason Canada was near the bottom of the list was that its legislation is “ineffective and archaic”!

Is it safe to say that “we all knew that”? Or are some people still living behind brick walls insensitive to what goes on around them?

You pick.

Tax Exemption

Today I went into Shoppers Drug Mart, a place I frequent a lot (because it is close to where I live), and a place that I enjoy going to.

I enjoy going to this Shoppers Drug Mart for only one thing: tax exemption. No, I am not here to brag and wave in your face, screaming, “I got tax exemption na-na-na-nah!” No, because that would be rude. I am not writing this to stick my nose in the air, give you evil looks for not being “tax-exempt.” No, because that would be condescending. Am I writing to talk about the stigma and embarrassment that sometimes comes with presenting my “tax-card” (which is a right to “Status Indians”) to certain cashiers? Maybe.

Working in retail, I know how most cashier systems work and can generally figure out how one works just by looking at it. When it first came into effect on July 1, 2010, there was uproar among First Nations. Roadblocks were put up. Protests arranged. The government later allowed First Nations to continue to be tax-exempt coming September 2010. The first time I asked for tax-exemption at retailer, I was scared. I was nervous. I was worried, would the retailer allow me? Would the retailer say “Sorry, no we don’t do that”? Would the retailer roller her eyes, sigh annoyingly, and pound the keys as if she is doing 20 more steps in the transaction process (but really its a matter of only pressing a few extra keys)?

Staples was my first store. They did it. I looked at my receipt and asked her why HST was still on there. She said, “because we take it off as a discount.” I did the math. It worked out.

Later in the month, I went to Metro grocery store. It was late in the night. Nobody, well barely anyone, was in the store. In fact, I only saw two other people, which just happened to be the cashiers. I asked for tax exemption. The cashier, rolled her eyes, grunted, and said, as if this could have been the most annoying thing to happen to her all week, “I have to call the manager.” I said, “ok.” I waited, for about 10 minutes. The manager came, did the exact gestures and made the same noises as the annoyed cashier. They joked together and laughed at “how stupid this process is getting,” as one of them said. I felt belittled and quite uncomfortable. I thought to myself, “Well, how annoying would it be for a company to have customers feel belittled while at the cashier?”

I have been to Metro on several other occasions after that. I always ask for tax-exemption (well, if it’s a few pennies/cents, I just let it slide). Each time, my experience is the same: uncomfortable. One visit was so bad that two different employees came to help the other one out. The one employee left her till (which had a line, when I knew she didn’t have to leave her line and that the manager had to be called–I knew she wasn’t the manager because of my frequency here) to help out at the till I was at (which by the end of the transaction there was a line, 8 people long). They continued to joke around and say things that made me not feel so great to be Native with “a cool tax-exemption card” (something that is my right).

By the end of the 20-minute transaction (yes it took 20 minutes), at about 2:30pm, the one cashier said, “Sorry, we see so many of these cards that we don’t know how to use them.” I don’t know why she said that but it didn’t help her reasoning for the 20-minute transaction. My reply, “Well, if you see so many of these cards, why is it that you don’t know how to do this type of transaction?” I walked away, upset, shaking, almost wanting to cry. I called my mom instead (she made me feel better and more relaxed). I feel it’s essential to know the time these transactions happened at because grocery stores are usually busy, before work, lunch time, and after work on a business day (which I was there on Wednesday); I was there at a “non-busy” time.

Shoppers Drug Mart. I am amazed at this store. They make presenting my “cool tax card” so simple. In fact, their process for doing tax exemption hasn’t changed since the HST changes. I was relieved, and I would go to Shoppers any day for things I need (even if it’s for some food that I know can be bought at Metro).

The one thing that I did want to say to the cashier tonight was this (after she talked about how “cool” it must be to have one), “It may be cool to be ‘tax-exempt,’ but it’s not cool when I feel uncomfortable and belittled by certain cashiers or businesses who give me a fuss over something that is a right.”

This “tax-card” isn’t just any card. It is a card that tells me who I am. It tells me that I am a Native Canadian, more specifically a “Status Indian.” It tells me that I have another number attached to my name, one beyond SIN. It tells me what my rights are under the Indian Act. It reminds that I am Native. It reminds me that some businesses don’t like “us” because of the transaction process. It reminds me that I will sometimes be annoying by a few extra buttons, a few extra minutes. It reminds me that I will never be treated equally, even if I am just a customer.